Political pressure to enroll ineligible canditates in KU

Karachi, Political pressures mainly from the parties in the alliance government are liable for a number of irregularities in the BS (bachelor of studies) admission process at Karachi University (KU) with a considerable number of students getting admission at the cost of those who deserved it.

The extent of political pressure can be measured from the fact that the head of the admission committee, Prof Dr Saleem Shehzad, was recently locked in his room for over half an hour by student-cum-political activists who wanted their colleagues enrolled in the university.

Prof Dr Shehzad was lucky that he rang up the administration and was rescued by the Rangers after half an hour, but no action was taken against the culprits involved in this act of humiliating a teacher. A similar incident took place last year, which was widely reported in the media but no action followed. So merit has naturally taken a backseat.

According to sources, the admission process that should have been completed in December last year continues as more and more students are reportedly being admitted to the departments. This year, around 4,800 students were given BS admissions, according to Prof Dr Saleem Shehzad.

So far, the university has issued three merit lists and as many claim lists. According to the third ‘valid’ claim, which is also available on the internet, 59 more students were inducted into BS (third year) master’s classes while 109 students were inducted into BS first year. The students were asked to submit fees by Jan 20.

A claim list is issued when there are objections to the merit list on grounds that deserving students with higher percentages have been deprived of admissions. According to sources, the issuance of three claim lists by the KU administration clearly shows that the merit lists earlier issued were faulty as they were later challenged. Secondly, the large number of students inducted through various claim lists point to the extent of irregularities. This, however, does not include the individual cases which are still being attended to at departments.

There are also serious concerns over the lack of teachers’ involvement in the admission process, which, according to KU teachers, has entirely been left to clerical staff. “Though there are 16 members of the admission committee which involve teachers, most of them exist only on paper. The entire job of data management and verification is handled by clerks,” a teacher said, adding that the process of mark sheet verification was not being properly followed.

Regarding the problems being faced due to the increased admissions, a teacher said that science departments were particularly facing difficulties due to lack of infrastructural facilities and shortage of staff. “The number of students has been increased without considering the student-teacher ratio, classroom and lab facilities. We have pointed out this anomaly to the administration many times,” she said.

Voicing teachers’ reservations over the admission process, Prof Dr Fayyaz Vaid, the secretary of the Karachi University Teachers Society, said the university had limited resources and increased admissions beyond the declared seat allocation had been a constant headache for the university teachers for the last few years.

“At an academic council’s meeting held last year before the admissions, I had raised the same point and called upon the administration that they should not give admissions more than the stated seat limit. Also, I requested that the administration must send the details of admissions offered on quotas. This is the area where there are chances of easy manipulations,” he said.

Commenting on the current centralized admission procedure, Dr Vaid said there was a dire need to decentralize the system. “The centralization of authority in a few individuals may lead to misuse of powers. Hence, there is a genuine need to involve a few teachers from every department in the admission process.”

Replying to Dawn’s queries, Prof Dr Saleem Shehzad, head of the KU admission committee, admitted that he had been facing immense pressures from political parties during the admission process for the past two years. “Yes, I was locked in by PSF student activists a few days ago. But they didn’t threaten or harass me. They were demanding admission for some students who were not eligible.”

Dr Shehzad denied that new admissions were still being made. When asked about increasing the number of departmental seats and issuance of three claim lists, he said: “Actually, many students didn’t submit their fees on time. We assumed that the students were not interested in admission and called other students who were on the waiting list. Later, the students submitted their fees and caused some problem in a few departments. However, no teacher complained to me on this issue in writing.”

According to Dr Shehzad, the checking of educational credentials was the responsibility of the enrollment section and last year admissions of 16 students were cancelled. “It takes time. And, usually, it’s after a semester that we get details about the genuineness of marksheets.”

About teachers’ involvement, he said the departments were asked to get involve in the verification of their students’ academic credentials, but none except a few responded.