The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Thursday extended its interim order suspending the CCE-2024 Results Stay Order until June 9th, 2026 . The decision came after the Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC) confirmed that all relevant examination records had been officially sealed in adherence to the court’s earlier directives.
A two-member constitutional bench, led by Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar and comprising Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro, presided over the hearing of multiple petitions challenging the May 6 announcement of the results.
During the proceedings, the SPSC submitted a detailed compliance report to the bench. The commission informed the court that all critical documents including attendance sheets, answer scripts, award sheets, and mark sheets had been secured and sealed. This measure, the SPSC argued, was taken to ensure maximum transparency and confidentiality amid the ongoing legal scrutiny.
The commission maintained that the recruitment process is still incomplete, as only the written examination results have been published while interviews for the qualified candidates remain pending. According to official data presented to the court, 4,340 candidates appeared in the written examination. Out of this pool, only 70 candidates managed to qualify after meeting the required minimum threshold of marks.
The SPSC further defended the integrity of the examination by stating that answer scripts were evaluated by independent subject specialists from across the country. The commission asserted that the marking process was conducted autonomously and was free from any external influence or administrative pressure.
The petitioners, who are aggrieved candidates, challenged the maintainability of the results, raising serious allegations of irregularities. They claimed that the examination process was flawed, arguing that many deserving candidates were unjustly ignored while so-called “blue-eyed” (favored) candidates were declared successful.
This SPSC Exam Result Controversy has sparked debate regarding the fairness of public service recruitment in the province. The petitioners requested the court to quash the results entirely and order a fresh evaluation of answer scripts under judicial supervision.
During the hearing, the bench made critical observations regarding the state of public service examinations in Sindh. Justice Muhammad Saleem Jessar remarked that any act undermining the principle of merit constitutes a serious wrongdoing, emphasizing that merit is the cornerstone of public service recruitment.
Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro, meanwhile, expressed sharp criticism toward the SPSC, noting that the commission had failed to learn from previous judicial observations made against it in past rulings. He pointed out that recurring issues in the commission’s examination processes have consistently drawn judicial ire, yet corrective measures appear insufficient.

In a procedural move, the court allowed the petitioners to implead the 70 successful candidates as respondents in the case, ensuring that all stakeholders are represented in the final adjudication. Additionally, SPSC officials and a provincial law officer waived formal notices in two newly filed identical petitions, streamlining the legal process.
The SPSC challenged the maintainability of the petitions on technical grounds. The commission argued that under the relevant service rules, aggrieved candidates are required to first seek remedies through internal representations and appeals before directly approaching the high court.
However, the bench was not persuaded to vacate the stay, ordering that its earlier interim suspension of the SPSC CCE-2024 Results News would remain effective.
The Sindh High Court CCE-2024 Case has now been adjourned until June 9. Until that date, the results of the 70 successful candidates remain in legal limbo. The extension of the stay means that the SPSC cannot proceed with the next phase of the recruitment process, including the pending interviews.
Legal experts suggest that the final outcome will depend heavily on whether the petitioners can provide concrete evidence of systematic bias or marking errors. Meanwhile, the successful candidates, who have now been made parties to the case, are expected to file their responses to defend their results.
As the Sindh Public Service Commission Latest News continues to dominate headlines, all eyes remain on the SHC’s June 9 hearing, where a decisive ruling on the validity of the CCE-2024 examination could reshape the recruitment landscape in the province.
Share your comments & questions here
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!