FPSC Rejects Propaganda, Clarifies Facts Around CSS 2026 Lahore Exam Centre Incident

The Federal Public Service Commission’s Firm Stance

The Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) has taken a definitive and public stand against what it calls a campaign of "propaganda" surrounding the Lahore examination centre for the ongoing CSS 2026 competitive exams . In an official statement, the commission firmly rejected misleading narratives, asserting that the nationwide examination process is proceeding smoothly according to the scheduled dates of February 4 to 15 . This article delves into the FPSC’s detailed clarification, the sequence of events in Lahore, and the commission’s warning against the spread of unverified information.

FPSC’s Official Rejection of Misleading Reports

In a clear and direct communication, the FPSC dismissed reports of mismanagement at the Lahore centre as unfounded. The commission emphasized that all facilities at examination centres across Pakistan are being provided in strict compliance with established rules and regulations. Furthermore, the FPSC highlighted that exams are starting and concluding precisely at their scheduled times, ensuring uniformity and fairness for all candidates. The statement served as a robust defense of the commission’s operational integrity amidst circulating claims.

Allegation of Motivated Misinformation from Coaching Academies

A significant part of the FPSC’s announcement pointed a finger at the source of the controversy. The commission alleged that the "wrong reporting" originated from "individuals associated with some CSS coaching academies." This accusation suggests a deliberate attempt to create unwarranted panic or discredit the examination process. In a strong warning, the FPSC explicitly stated that it reserves the legal right to initiate action against those found responsible for disseminating false and misleading information, marking a stern stance against external interference.

Background: CSS 2026 Examination Structure and Logistics

To understand the context, it is essential to note the scale and changes implemented for CSS 2026. The examination is being conducted across 136 centres nationwide , with the Lahore centre being a major hub. This year, the FPSC introduced key changes for candidate convenience: shifting to one paper per day instead of two, and moving the start time for compulsory papers from 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM. These adjustments were designed to reduce candidate fatigue and allow for better preparation time between papers.

Detailed Chronology of the Lahore Centre Incident

The FPSC provided a meticulous timeline to counter the vague allegations:

• February 4, 2026: The FPSC received a report alleging that some candidates were not allowed timely entry at the Lahore centre, operated by the Punjab Public Service Commission.

• Immediate Investigation: The commission promptly formed an investigation board to review evidence and witness statements.

• The Centre’s Capacity: The Lahore centre, equipped with modern facilities and 23 examination halls, was registered to accommodate 4,110 candidates .

• Clear Instructions: As per rules available on the FPSC website and admission certificates, candidates were required to be seated 50 minutes before the 11:00 AM start .

• Standard Procedure Followed: Staff arrived on time, halls were opened at 9:40 AM, and the majority of candidates entered by 10:10 AM. Following Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), the main gate was closed at 10:14 AM .

• Late Arrivals and Humanitarian Gesture: Despite clear instructions, approximately 1,000 to 1,200 candidates arrived late . On humanitarian grounds, the chief supervisor reopened the gate from 10:27 AM to 10:32 AM to accommodate them. The exam commenced and concluded as scheduled.

FPSC’s Emphasis on Rules and Humanitarian Consideration

The commission’s response underscores a dual commitment: to unwavering examination discipline and to fairness for candidates. The FPSC reiterated that the 50-minute early seating rule is clearly communicated and is consistent with practices in other major exams like the MDCAT. This rule allows for necessary administrative and verification procedures. However, demonstrating flexibility, the commission made an exception on humanitarian grounds to allow latecomers to sit for the exam, a fact it states was omitted from the misleading reports.

Upholding Integrity and a Warning Against False Narratives

The FPSC’s comprehensive clarification aims to set the record straight and reassure the public about the sanctity of the CSS examination process. By detailing the events and reaffirming its adherence to SOPs, the commission seeks to dispel rumors and maintain public trust. The strong warning of potential legal action against propagators of misinformation serves as a deterrent against future attempts to manipulate public perception or disrupt the examination system. The incident highlights the challenges of managing large-scale competitive exams and the importance of relying on official channels for accurate information.